A Divided Spy by Charles Cumming
 Friday, February 24, 2017 at 7:02AM
Friday, February 24, 2017 at 7:02AM 
Published by St. Martin's Press on February 14, 2017
A Divided  Spy is the final book in the Thomas Kell trilogy. It builds on the death  of Kell’s girlfriend, Rachel Wallinger, and makes occasional reference  other to key events in the earlier novels, but it can easily be read as a  standalone. However, the reader will likely appreciate the depth of the  characters more fully with the benefit of insights provided by the  first two novels.
At 46, Thomas Kell has left behind his  dangerous days as a spy. Since Rachel’s murder in Istanbul, Kell has  gone out of his way to avoid former colleagues at MI6. Kell would like  to seek vengeance against Alexander Minasian, the man he holds  responsible for Rachel’s assassination, but he has almost resigned  himself to injustice. Or at least, he is resigned to it until he learns  that Minasian has been spotted at a resort in Egypt.
Kell’s first  step is to befriend Bernhard Riedle in Brussels. Riedle is Minasian’s  jilted lover. Perhaps Kell can use Riedle to set up Minasian … but who  is setting up whom? As is common in spy novels, trust is easily  misplaced, leaving the reader to puzzle out the intrigue.
The  other plot development involves Shahid Khan, who is returning to England  (his birthplace and a land he now views as evil) to carry out a  mission. Kell learns, indirectly and incompletely, that a terrorist plot  against London might be afoot, and that soon becomes the focus of  Kell’s investigation — to the limited extent that his boss, who doubts  the authenticity of Kell’s source, will allow him to do anything at all.  Of course, the spy who ignores his boss in order to do what he believes  to be right is a time-honored theme of spy fiction, and Kell fits  within that mold.
Modern spy novels often feature ISIS terrorists  while Cold War spy novels reliably focused on Russians. It’s unusual to  find a novel that includes both, but Charles Cumming manages to merge them  deftly.
Much of the tension in A Divided Spy comes from  uncertainty as to whether Kell is being played and, if so, by whom. The  battle of wits between Kell and Minasian never quite enters Le Carré  territory, but it is both convincing and engaging. The novel’s strength,  in fact, is its portrayal of two spies who, while separated by  ideology, are fundamentally similar people — a theme Le Carré executed  to perfection and that Cumming handles with aplomb.
Cumming’s  exploration of the mentality of a spy is really an exploration of anyone  who deceives. Telling a constant stream of lies, whether for personal  gain or to advance a government’s interests, changes a person’s nature,  prevents him from being true to himself. People who care about the truth  (people who are not sociopaths) may be destroyed by living a lie, and  that is seen to different degrees in both of the novel’s central  characters.
At the same time, living with ambiguity, never  knowing whether a source (or even a colleague) can be trusted, makes it  hard to maintain a moral center. Trust can get you killed; an inability  to trust can do the same. The moral conflicts that characterize the best  spy fiction are particularly strong in the concluding chapters of A  Divided Spy. The novel is a fine end to a series that, taken as a  whole, is probably Cumming’s best work.
RECOMMENDED
 TChris |
TChris |    Post a Comment |
Post a Comment |    Charles Cumming,
Charles Cumming,   spy  in
spy  in   Thriller
Thriller  
Reader Comments