« Cause of Death by Jeffery Deaver | Main | How to Find Your Way in the Dark by Derek B. Miller »
Friday
Jul302021

Unthinkable by Brad Parks

Published by Thomas & Mercer on July 27, 2021

Unthinkable is a suspense novel/thriller that employs themes often explored by science fiction writers: the nature of time, whether the future is predetermined (perhaps because there is no meaningful distinction between the future and the past), and whether the exercise of free will makes it possible to change the future. Brad Parks splits the baby in half by positing that it is, in fact, possible to change the future, but only if the change is made by someone who can see the future. The rest of us are powerless and must accept that our futures are already written and whatever we do is what we were always going to do.

The nature of space-time and the question of free will are fascinating topics that Parks dances around with just enough dance steps to set up his thriller plot. Don’t expect the novel to be informed by a deep (or even coherent) theory of time. This isn’t a science fiction novel. If it were, it wouldn’t be a good one. This is instead a thriller that makes use of a science fiction theme. Just as it isn’t a good science fiction novel, it’s a mediocre thriller.

An accomplished lawyer named Jenny Welker is pursuing her career while the less accomplished lawyer to whom she is married stays home and raises their two kids. Jenny is bringing a massive lawsuit against a power company based on statistical evidence that the company’s air pollution is responsible for a pocket of cancer victims. Since lawsuits of that nature are expensive and difficult to win, her firm (which doesn’t seem like the kind of firm that cares about injury victims) is uncertain that she should continue to pursue it.

Jenny’s husband, Nate Lovejoy, begins the novel by being kidnapped. His kidnapper tells him that a wealthy man named Vanslow DeGange has the power to see the future. DeGrange formed a shadowy organization to carry out his various plans to change history. Thriller writers love shadowy organizations. This one is called the Praesidium. Nothing good can come of a shadowy group with a name like that. Nor is anything good likely to come from a novel that imagines the existence of yet another conspiratorial group with a pretentious name.

Nate is told that DeGrange has foreseen that Jenny will conjure up some brilliant new legal theory to win the case against the power company, creating a precedent that will allow every power company to be sued, a dire result that improbably makes global warming worse and leads to countless deaths. Naturally, the only way to save all those lives is to kill Jenny. And since DeGrange has seen the future, he knows that the world can only be saved if Nate kills Jenny. Why Nate? Because that’s how DeGrange saw it coming down. About half the novel is spent convincing Nate that DeGrange really can see the future and Nate really will kill Jenny. To give him an extra incentive, the Praesidium promises to kill his kids if he doesn’t kill his wife.

That tortured setup is supposed to explain why Nate doesn’t instantly go to the FBI and to Jenny to report this nonsensical threat. Instead, Nate tries to get to the bottom of the Praesidium because of course he does. That’s what thriller protagonists do. Eventually, Nate does get to the bottom of a conspiracy that proves to be easily unraveled and a little silly. But before that happens, we’re treated to the inevitable “will he or won’t he kill his wife?” moment. I won’t spoil it, but you know the answer already.

Brad Parks has written some decent books but he’s also written novels that, like this one, are just so contrived that they never create the sense of realism that is needed to generate suspense. I get the sense that he pitched this novel as “a man has no choice but to kill the wife he loves,” hears “that’s great, go for it” in response, and then writes himself into a corner to make it work. It doesn’t work. I have no problem with Parks’ writing style, but I have a huge problem with a concept that leads to a predictably climactic moment before fizzling out entirely over the last hundred pages.

NOT RECOMMENDED

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.